Resource > Articles >
FDA and NIH accelerate shift away from animal testing as experts discuss pros and cons
7 key factors to guide your selection
Filed under: General OOC and MASLD/MASH
In a watershed moment for preclinical and biomedical research, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have unveiled bold plans to reduce reliance on and shift away from animal testing. The strategy emphasizes the application of advanced, human-relevant methods, like New Alternate Methodologies (NAMs), such as Organ-on-a-chip (OOC) technology, also known as Microphysiological Systems (MPS), AI-based models, and organoids, with animal testing becoming the exception rather than the rule.
A groundbreaking policy shift
On April 10, 2025, the FDA released a landmark roadmap aimed at phasing out animal research with a shift away from animal testing requirements for certain therapies, particularly highlighting monoclonal antibody (mAbs)- based drugs. The agency is encouraging the submission of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), with potential incentives like streamlined review for submissions that rely on strong NAMs data.
Complementing this, the NIH followed suit, a couple of weeks later, by announcing its intent to prioritize grant proposals based on non-animal research methods. It also established the Office of Research Innovation, Validation, and Application (ORIVA) to spearhead the development, validation, and implementation of these innovative approaches across the agency’s biomedical portfolio.
Collectively, the FDA and NIH are steering research toward more human-relevant methods, such as, human organoids, OOC, AI-driven analyses, and real-world population health data as powerful alternatives to traditional animal models. The FDA is also projecting that animal testing will become “the exception rather than the norm” within the next three to five years.
Voices of enthusiasm…and caution
Tomasz Kostrzewski, CSO at CN Bio, expressed genuine surprise and clear optimism. “It’s fantastic,” he remarked. “There’s a place for animals in drug discovery, but animal research shouldn’t be the go-to.”
Joseph Wu, a Stanford Medicine cardiologist and co-founder of Greenstone Biosciences, echoed this view, pointing to the frequent lack of human relevance in animal models—especially inbred mice—and praising the potential of stem-cell derived organoids to accelerate high-throughput screening of candidate therapies.
Aysha Akhtar, CEO of the Center for Contemporary Sciences, warned pharmaceutical firms to embrace this shift swiftly to avoid the risk of being “left behind”.
Despite the excitement, experts also stress that NAMs are not yet ready to fully replace animal use but support the shift away from animal testing. Organoid models, often lack the complexity of full human physiological systems, while some advanced models and AI systems pose additional implementation costs, infrastructure demands and workforce training requirements.
Looking Ahead
The FDA and NIH’s joint push toward human-based, AI-driven, and organ-mimetic models signals a profound transformation in biomedical research. Tomasz Kostrzewski’s optimism captures the pioneering spirit of this shift, yet its success hinges on robust validation, funding, and institutional will.
Original article was published in BioCompare on 19 May, 2025.

Dr. Tomasz Kostrzewski
Chief Scientific Officer
